ASME applauds $1 billion in emergency funding to NASA
ASME President Terry Shoup sent a letter of thanks to the chair and
ranking member of the Senate Appropriations Commerce, Justice and Science
Subcommittee for introducing an amendment to add $1 billion in emergency
funding to the fiscal year 2007 NASA budget. The letter was co-signed
by Ralph W. Wyndrum, Jr., president of the Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers-USA.
In part, the letter reads, "NASA was devastated by the Columbia
Shuttle disaster and Hurricane Katrina, and was never financially reimbursed
for either incident, which forced dramatic cuts to other programs. Your
amendment for $1 billion in emergency funds will help restore funding
to the Aeronautics, Science, and Exploration Mission Directorates by
reimbursing these accounts. During this tight fiscal environment, vital
research was being cut to fund emergency repairs to return the shuttle
to flight. However, the nation's commercial and military aviation is
dependent upon the research of NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate."
In addition to funding NASA, the Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations
Bill funds the National Science Foundation, the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission,
the Federal Trade Commission, the Office of the United States Trade
Representative, and the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State.
While the House passed its version of the bill on June 29, the Senate
is not expected to consider its version until after Sept. 30, the end
of the current fiscal year. In that case, Congress would have to pass
a "continuing resolution" to fund those agencies and programs
covered by the measure until the fiscal year 2007 funding bill is approved
and agreed to by both the House and Senate.
To read the entire letter, go to www.asme.org/NewsPublicPolicy/GovRelations/
PositionStatements.
ASME lends support to R&D coalition letter to congressional leaders
ASME is supporting a letter to congressional leaders calling for the
reinstatement of the federal R&D tax credit. Legislation establishing
the R&D tax credit was enacted in 1981 to encourage businesses to
invest in long-term, high-risk R&D activities in the United States.
The credit expired eight months ago.
In part, the letter reads, "The undersigned companies represent
American innovation. We are the idea generators and risk takers who
want to continue investing, hiring and conducting research in the United
States. The research and development tax credit expired more than eight
months ago. The laps of the credit and accompanying uncertainty have
increased the costs of U.S.-based R&D. As such, it is increasingly
more difficult for us to commit to future high-risk, high-dollar R&D
investments that would create high-wage jobs in the United States. We
strongly urge you to ensure that, in September, Congress sends to the
President a bill with a seamless and strengthened R&D tax credit.
"The National Academies recently cautioned that 'without high-quality,
knowledge-intensive jobs and the innovative enterprises that lead to
discovery and new technology, our economy will suffer and our people
will face a lower standard of living.' Our trading partners around the
globe recognize the long-term value of R&D and have moved aggressively
to implement generous and permanent tax policies that attract these
vital investments to their shores."
To read the entire letter, go to www.nam.org/s_nam/page_form.asp?CID=
201823&DID=233739&rcss=print.
Fate of energy and water appropriations bill uncertain
Earlier this year, a bill supporting new funds for energy R&D looked
like it would sail through Congress. The President's American Competitiveness
Initiative (ACI) and Advanced Energy Initiative (AEI) put funding for
new basic energy research and emerging technology research at the top
of the national agenda.
Leaders in both the House and the Senate expressed enthusiasm for the
president's budget request for the Department of Energy's Office of
Science and other areas of energy research. However, as Congress approached
its fall recess, prospects appeared dim for passage of its fiscal 2007
Energy and Water appropriations bill, H.R. 5427.
Both Senate and House appropriators initially seemed ready to follow
the president's lead. This past summer, each chamber agreed on approximately
$4.2 billion for the Office of Science, as well as significant investments
in energy technologies as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and
the president's AEI. Since then, however, Congress did little with H.R.
5427.
Part of the delay in passing the appropriations measure can be explained
by the electoral calendar. With public attention focused on the war
in Iraq and immigration, senators have been focused on the Defense and
Homeland Security bills, not this energy appropriations bill.
More problematic, though, may be increasing clashes between members
of the House and Senate Appropriations Committee and the House Energy
and Commerce Committee over the future of the government's nuclear power
programs. Members of each committee appear increasingly far apart on
the future of nuclear waste storage and the president's new Global Nuclear
Energy Partnership (GNEP). Energy and Water Appropriations chairs Sen.
Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and Rep. David Hobson, R-Ohio, want to move ahead
with interim storage for nuclear waste, a move that House Energy and
Commerce chair Joe Barton, R-Texas, strongly opposes.
House and Senate appropriations have also disagreed strongly over the
president's $250 million budget request for GNEP. Such major differences
on the controversial nuclear programs may prevent Congress from passing
the Energy and Water appropriations bill this year, and instead use
a continuing resolution to fund these programs.
Testimony from the recent House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee
hearing on nuclear energy can be found at http://appropriations.house.gov/index.cfm?
FuseAction=Hearings.Detail&HearingId=810&Month=
9&Year=2006.
Testimony from the recent Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee
on the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) can be found at http://appropriations.senate.gov/subcommittees/
energy/topics.cfm?code=energy.
back to columns