Members of Society's new executive management
committee are announced
In preparation for a new operational structure
that will become effective July 1, 2005, ASME Executive Director Virgil
R. Carter in late May announced the reorganization of its executive
management committee.
The newly designated executive management committee will take on the
following new positions: Thomas Loughlin, deputy executive director;
Joseph Holm, associate executive director, Administration; June Ling,
associate executive director, Codes and Standards; John Corcoran, managing
director, Services; Burt Dicht, managing director, Knowledge and Community
Groups; Phil Hamilton, managing director, Strategic Management; Warren
Leonard, managing director, Governance; Michael Michaud, managing director,
Institutes; Laurel Raso, managing director, Human Resources; David Soukup,
managing director, Centers; and Elizabeth Barna, manager, Executive
Office.
When announcing the members, Carter explained that, until July 1, 2005,
ASME will function in a dual leadership role of maintaining existing
titles, roles and responsibilities while preparing for the transition
to the new roles.
"ASME is fortunate to have the caliber of staff it does to lead
the organization through this incredible transformation," Carter
said. "We are challenging our organization, at every level, to
become more agile, global and market-focused. ASME, even after nearly
125 years, is dedicated to its core values of knowledge, community and
advocacy to the engineering profession. We must, however, continuously
strive to improve and reflect the diverse and multidisciplinary nature
of the engineering practice today and in the future."
ASME's Continuity and Change initiative is part of ASME's
overall change management effort, which began in 1999.
The Society's Board of Governors approved the initial plan for
a new organizational structure in March 2004, which set into motion
Phase II of the transition. Prior to that approval, ASME had done market
and environmental analyses, gone through a Balanced Scorecard process,
held General Assembly meetings, and conducted customer and member surveys.
With Phase II under way, ASME's members and staff will be participating
in detailed planning project teams, paving the way for the implementation
of the new structure.
"This next phase of our reorganization will be the most challenging,"
Carter explained. "We are asking the organization, from the membership
to the staff, to re-envision what ASME will look like, how we will function
and what we will be; until we do that, however, we still need to maintain
our day-to-day operations. We'll all be doing double-duty for
a while."
back to news & features