Protection against terror hinges on understanding
risk, panelists find
Emily M. Smith
ASME NEWS
Understanding risk through analysis and assessment
will be the single most effective way to combat terrorism, when combined
with educating public policy makers on how to use risk assessment tools
and incorporate them into performance test codes. That is what a group
of senior-level industry and government executives concluded at the
end of a two-day meeting of ASME's Industry Advisory Board in October.
The application of risk analysis and assessment could be so effective
that the IAB members recommended that ASME develop common terminology,
metrics and methodology such as game theory to assess
vulnerability. (See "Designing for Sabotage," Mechanical Engineering
magazine, September 2002.)
Brian
Sheridan (center), deputy general manager, National Security Programs
and Operations at Bechtel Nevada, explains protection for critical assets.
Massoud Amin, manager of Infrastructure Integrations and Markets at
the Electric Power Research Institute (left), and Bobby R. Gillham (right),
manager of Global Security at ConocoPhillips, listen.
More than 40 people attended "The Engineer's Response to Homeland
Security," including representatives from the U.S. Department of
Defense, Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and
the Office of Homeland Security.
Among the subjects in the panel sessions, IAB attendees considered Protecting
Critical Assets, Government Initiatives to Enhance Security Through
Engineering and Technology, and the Role of Science, Engineering and
Technology in the War Against Terror.
During each of the panel sessions, several speakers said that what makes
risk analysis particularly effective is its widespread impact. Its routine
application will help direct resources to prevent, mitigate and respond
to attacks.
The role for engineers as lifeguards, in the ultimate sense, is equally
ubiquitous.
"During the Cold War," William Jeffrey, deputy to the assistant
director for Homeland and National Security, White House Office of Science
and Technology Policy, said in his keynote address, "engineers
stood at the vanguard in protecting our nation. Today, the adversary
has changed, but the need for the intellectual power of the U.S. research
community has not changed."
back to news & features