
Leading Change
As engineers, we are accustomed to measuring
the results and outcomes of our work. Measurements allow us to gauge
the progress we have made in the direction we want to go.
ASME's Continuity and Change Initiative, now in its Phase II:
Transition, is designed to provide our organization with the greatest
opportunity to meet the challenges of the future and take advantage
of the opportunities. Our work using the Balanced Scorecard and the
Strategic Marketing Report provided us with the roadmap. Now our efforts
to build a vibrant and valuable organization are moving forward.
In March 2004, the Board of Governors accepted the recommendations from
the Core Team that included a new organizational structure. The new
Continuity and Change structure will help ASME maintain its position
as the premier professional engineering organization.
We are identifying, through a consensus-based method, those critical
functions that we will need to ensure our future success. Concurrently,
we are identifying those programs, functions and activities that no
longer align with our strategic objectives. Eliminating them, while
difficult, is necessary in order to ensure the success and future growth
of ASME.
The Project Management Task Force (PMTF), appointed by Past President
Reginald Vachon, is leading the charge in this process. Their work,
overseeing this transition to the new ASME, continues. Existing councils,
boards, project teams and focus groups have been charged with identifying
those functions that are vital to ASME and which must continue; determining
the synergies within existing functions, programs and activities and
consolidating them to optimize their effect; and identifying the functions,
programs and activities that no longer add value to ASME.
You, our members, through project teams and focus groups that are responsible
to parent councils, are doing this work together with selected staff.
The PMTF is charged by the Board of Governors (BOG) to monitor and coordinate
these projects and make necessary recommendations to the BOG for their
implementation within the new structure by July 1, 2005.
As Continuity and Change goes forward, we must not overlook a significant
financial measurement: the FY06 budget will be approximately $6 million
dollars or nearly 10 percent, less than the current one. Why?
The BOG made the fiscally prudent decision to remove projected investment
earnings from our operating budget. This places ASME in a mode of budgeting
and spending only what is actually available. Project teams and focus
groups will devote time and energy toward recommendations that can be
implemented within the available resources in FY06. We must continue
to be prudent in our fiscal management and discerning in setting our
objectives.
The new structure provides for and promotes new interest groupings that
present greater opportunities for member participation and are more
cost effective.
Realistically assessing and prioritizing our projects and programs will
allow us to keep building the body of knowledge and setting the standards
for which ASME is internationally recognized. This is a time to align
our programs and activities with our strategic objectives while recognizing
our constraints. It is a time of challenges and a time of unique opportunities
for change and growth. We are moving forward, building a solid foundation
for the future.
Harry Armen
ASME President
back to columns